back

by jtwaleson·10y ago·view on hn ↗
Interesting that they do this via partnerships with news outlets etc.

Last year they adapted search rankings to get everyone producing mobile-friendly pages. They could have done the same here. Great for getting the web forward, but it's a bit mafia like. "Nice 1st search result you have there, would be a shame if something happened to it...". I would like if it they used this again to get other things on everyone's prio list: IPv6, HTTP/2.0, page load time. It's a bit of a nuclear weapon, but it gets things moving.

More on topic: I have the strange feeling that AMP will somehow help them to "inline" the search results like they currently do with wikipedia etc.. That way your site becomes just a data source for Google, they're not actually driving traffic to it.

1 comments
This is where my questions drift to as well. What is the strategic play here? With FB's Instant Articles it is obvious they want to keep users on the FB platform and eventually tighten the noose on publishers while avoiding any ad blockers. Can't say I blame them.

Not totally clear on what the end game is with Google here. They make a substantial portion of their revenue from the display inventory these publishers provide.

--EDIT--

Just found an article that does a great job answering some of these questions.

http://highscalability.com/blog/2015/12/14/does-amp-counter-...