User are frustrated with the complexity of computers, but they don't want it solved with simplicity. They want the rich feature set, but with the complexity managed. Big difference.
back
1 comments
If I permit myself to indulge in a little bit of criticism I would say that your comments however articulate they are, when we consider the semantics it simply does not make any sense.
Thanks. (But you speak like the caterpillar in Alice in Wonderland.) Ok, here's an analogy:
When the car was young, to start it you had to crank in the front while someone else was pulling at the clutch, and to steer it you used reigns.
What did people want? A modified version of the car which was simple to start and operate, or a bicycle?
People want a simplified presentation of feature-rich objects, not simple objects.
If you do not take it as an offense Sir, it would be certainly helpful to you if you can add a new word to your vocabulary which I believe is already rich due to your extensive reading (since you have mentioned Alice in Wonderland). That word is "Sarcasm". Reading P.G. Wodehouse too might be a of help.
Some one also told me that women are better jet riders because it doesnt have a reverse gear.