A computer is a tool that helps us wonder. If you can open it up in a clear, abstractable, safe way, there doesn't have to be limits to that wondering.
And flying isn't? Surely it is for some, just as for some it is "merely" a tool for transportation.
A computer is a tool that helps us wonder.
So is a book. You don't have to be able to program The Little Prince or The Way Things Work in order for it to help you wonder.
A computer is a tool that helps us wonder.
And my mom wonders why it keeps crashing when she tries to check her email. I tried to explain how important it was that she had the freedom to fix the bug herself, but she won't listen. She foolishly is only concerned with checking her email.
If you can X...
Which is to say X is not yet a solved problem, or even one known to have a solution. In the meantime: Forgive us all who dare persist contentedly with balloons and dirigibles.
Flying and books incite us to wonder. A computer can assist us in wondering. It can enable us to explore ideas. That's the potential of the computer and that's what Alan's Dynabook was promising.
Sure, we can rip out functionality until we have a computer that is so pretty and simple that a monkey can use it, but that's not fulfilling the promise that computers hold. That's not what Alan was talking about.
Forgive us all who dare persist contentedly with balloons
You're forgiven. (Just not tolerated well on a place like HN. :-)
So now my mother is a monkey? Come on now, you're exaggerating.
But seriously, I apologize if I went over the top. I understand and respect what you're saying. There's nothing wrong with getting the current state-of-the-art stable and usable; I shouldn't have intimated otherwise.
Edit: And don't tell your mom what I said or she'll tell my mom, and then I'll get it.