Some amateurs have identified errors in the published literature. They've identified typos. If they show to be significant, I would most certainly want to know.

Because you are concerned that their corrections might affect the debate, you compare them to deranged conspiracy theorists in an effort to discredit them.

No, I simply don't want action to stop because an amatuer found a minor error and start having to go back to debating it all from the beginning again.