Less amount of economically valuable species of fishes = increase in squids, jellyfishes and unedible species. Nothing really new here.
And for anecdotes, I live in the Midwest US and had cuttlefish last week.
Those people do exist in the area, or the restaurants wouldn't bother to have them on the menu, it's just uncommon.
Do you care about animals? Then you really shouldn't eat octopus - http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/26/do-you-...
1- if A is true (meaning are you a good citizen or not?)
2- then do B
Hiding the fact that A is a emotional statement and can fit in lots of opposite cases and circumstances because is ambiguous and moral based, and "moral" is an elusive and unmeasurable concept.
Thus, A and B are presented as dependent variables without any proof of this, and in fact in most of the cases are unrelated.
"Do you care about animals (preyed by nasty tentacular predators)? then you really should eat octopus", works perfectly also.
http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150223-mysteries-of-canniba...
The males are kind of accustomed to being eaten.
With apologies to Futurama.
> No one who considers themselves interested in the inner lives of animals, the wonders and mysteries of the natural world, can eat cephalopods in good conscience.
The article never says other animals are less deserving of care. The author is just particularly interested in octopus, and is appealing to the trait of intelligence.
(FWIW, I eat meat and think squid are delicious. Just posting a related link to see what discussion comes of it.)
Argh. Horror.
Some Spaniards will beg to differ.
Edit: nevermind, I googled it, as I should have the first time. Turns out I was just too 'Merican.