If Gary Kildall been at work when IBM called, we'd all be running CP/M.
If your success is based even somewhat on luck, then is society entitled to take (through inheritance and income taxes) some of your gained wealth and redistribute it? Why (not)?
Should lotteries be abolished because they reflect pure luck only? Should the government confiscate all but a bit of the earnings? (I know, they already do, but let's argue the justification!)
This should initiate a long discussion here, with vociferous objections from the "I did it all myself - it wasn't luck!" crowd of entrepreneurs. Somewhat in opposition, the article also ties (but only somewhat) into Obama's "You didn't build that..." oratory:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/06/study-shows-oba...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_didn't_build_that
Also relevant reading is
"The luck factor: fortune’s role in our lives" By Jonathan Derbyshire
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3b73bf58-079f-11e6-9b51-0fb5e65703...
Google cached copy at http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:CxippMy...
Of course, Nicholas Taleb's "Fooled By Randomness" awaits you.
https://www.amazon.com/Lucky-Smart-Fifty-First-Time-Entrepre...