Sure, they could, but it doesn't make business sense. This scheme might even cause a class action lawsuit from the people who bought it AFTER they knew it was fraud but BEFORE they removed it. Refunds very likely cost money in the form of credit card transaction fees and wages (people doing the refunding as well as CS fielding calls for two days).
back
3 comments
Isn't that a classic cost of business which they're charging 30% of each transaction to cover? Banks do that kind of thing all the time with things like wire transfers where the fees and delays are, in part, expected to cover the cost of errors and abuse.
This scheme might even cause a class action lawsuit from the people who bought it AFTER they knew it was fraud but BEFORE they removed it.
Class actions suits have to show damages, no? After the money is refunded, what would the plaintiffs allege?
First, a class action suit for 48 hours of downloads on an app is not likely.
And certainly when fraud is detected some refunds will occur. So they set the tolerances such that they can pay those refunds with the fees they extract on the other side of the curve.
> First, a class action suit for 48 hours of downloads on an app is not likely.
You'd be amazed at what a few billion in the bank will attract, especially when it's cheaper to settle than litigate.