back

by toddmorey·9y ago·view on hn ↗
I think the name will work out just fine (witness MySQL and PostgreSQL).

From looking at the docs, the two-way binding seems entirely optional and I can't find anything that would prevent a developer from using a redux model of state management.

I've got framework fatigue, too, but on the surface this project seems to embody the best of what I love: a tiny API, little magic, and getting out of the way.

1 comments
Yes, I was thinking whether it would be possible to use Redux. You would need to add some code to hook that up to the components, though.

As for the name sure, but now there's a lot of competition between frameworks, and you want to get all help you can marketing-wise. I might be shallow, but I've not looked at projects a lot of times just because I didn't like the name. I just have no time to make informed decisions, there's too much stuff to look at. I'll see if besides the concept/purpose I like the logo and name a lot of times.