back
1 comments
Spend even a small amount of time on congress.gov/bill, and you notice every bill has this tacked on. It's to leave wiggle room for the inevitable backroom dealing and amendments that it takes to get legislation passed nowadays.

Don't like it? Call your Congress people and voice your support for:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-joint-res...

and

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/395/... Note the irony here in the bill text

All they (congress) would have to do is vote to 'deem' that only one subject was in the law. Just like they voted to 'deem' that Obamacare originated in the House, when it actually originated in the Senate. They did this to get around the Constitutional requirement that all spending bills originate in the House.
Would it be up to Congress? I am not a lawyer, but my reading of the bill is that it would give courts the authority to void any act that they deem non-compliant.
I wonder if that's irony or humor.