We want to promote diversity where we can, and if you walked into our office today you'd be surprised at the balance we've got.
My statement was highlighting what the current state of tech is, and to make a more gender diverse working space i would have to sacrifice quality / skills / talent, which I will not do.
But if I am not willing to sacrifice, how am I supposed to have a more diverse space?
The main point here I've already addressed in my reply to your parent comment, but there's an additional point worth making.
There are now two (to my knowledge) studies that show diverse teams outperform heterogenious teams. The diverse teams feel less comfortable because your team members might fail the "would I enjoy working with you on a sunday" test, or the "do I want to go for a beer with you" test, but the additional perspectives provide meaningful insight
Edit: The point being that assessing team members on the basis of individual skill misses an important point about the way teams behave as a whole
that's like expecting that photo models should be ugly women as well or sellers should be rude people to have diversity just for the sake of diversity
As OP has stated, and I concur - diversity always encourages one to be more empathic, and generally leads to better teams.
Side note - your definition / standards of beauty or customer service will be wildly different to mine, which will be wildly different to someone on the other end of the planet. You can have diverse teams, with varying strengths and weaknesses in individuals but still be a net positive.