However, these immediate policy violations are strange to me. As someone who writes software for a lot of field crews, these kinds of exceptions happen _all the time_ and very often they're for explainable reasons. (the guy's hands were busy, he asked his buddy to move the heavy tool).
I'm sure they're aware of this but you have to work in some kind of tolerance to these kinds of compliance violations, because the ultimate goal is increased safety, not finger-wagging.
http://www.zdnet.com/article/why-windows-must-die-for-the-th...
Was a pretty interesting read today.
That and they go on to show technology that can be used ways that could cause privacy concerns.
Eloquent as always.
Here is an idea for a service: You lease the translation service for the term of your trip for a dollar a day. You can lease on demand for 24 hours for 5 dollars.
It's "couldn't care less" [1].
Google Translate by Google, Inc. https://appsto.re/us/kT-Ty.i
I am so impressed by the device and her reaction. Something so small can give someone just enough sense of control in their lives. It's incredible.
I watched the episode and was blown away!
Some of the implication is that "everything is Cloud" now. Serverless (AWS Lambda/Azure Functions) and "Cloud" container models may increasingly be a way applications are built and deployed, to any device, including end user devices.
Microsoft seems to be positioning that Azure is increasingly a platform for every type of application, from IoT, to on premises Enterprise, to, of course, Cloud, and possibly everything between.
I would add that if an Azure strategy works out for them, the "device" wars (be it Win vs. iOS vs. Android or Desktop vs. Mobile) really won't matter if they manage to be at the center of it all.
Can anyone explain what's with this: "you are running ML algorithms in the cloud, and we enable you to run them locally!"
Can't we already run them locally??? Why not run them locally in the first place if speed and low latency is required?
How ugly can that be?