back

by shagie·9y ago·view on hn ↗
One of the photographers that I'm intrigued by is Michael Wesely ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Wesely ) who takes ultra long exposures (a two week long exposure is "short" - his flower photographs are in that range). The museum of modern art was about two years. http://www.amusingplanet.com/2010/08/unusually-long-exposure...

You can see the tracks of the days and the cloud cover in those photographs. Note that the multiple year ones have multiple days going over a single track.

Aside from the extreme reciprocity failure in the film, its "only" about three stops from a one day exposure to a one week exposure... and another two stops to a month, and then another three and a half stops to a year.

1 comments
Thanks for the reminder on the reciprocity rules! I used to take super-long exposure with my 4x5/10x8 view cameras as well... basically after a few minutes, it doesn't /really/ matter anymore so stop counting in minutes/seconds, more in teacups+newspaper pages :-) I always loved the tonal range you get on way, WAY overexposed film.
Digging up an old page (I am not sure if the film still has that characteristic curve), Provia 100F had some very nice lack of reciprocity failure. http://home.earthlink.net/~kitathome/LunarLight/moonlight_ga... (from http://home.earthlink.net/~kitathome/LunarLight/moonlight_ga... - its an old frames page).

The correction for a 1200 second (20m) exposure on Kodak black and white film was at 12x (for 14400s, 4h). However, the extrapolation for the curve for Provia 100F put the reciprocity failure for 1200s at 2.35 for a 3000 second exposure.

Looking at the methods and results is interesting, though I've gone nearly full digital now.