On the contrary, social media is breaking the media monopoly on crowd influence.
Everything the author wrote has truth to it, but this is outweighed by the democratization of public audience.
Power to the people!
Everything the author wrote has truth to it, but this is outweighed by the democratization of public audience.
Power to the people!
Power to the people to express themselves? Give everybody the means to operate a self-hosted blog (that is, they and _only_ they are responsible for what is said and how).
Is more competition for imposing a narrative on the lives of others really what we need? It seems to inhibit individual users critical thoughts which would undermine democratic efficacy.