Item — HN Reader

Meh. The author goes on a rant against Trump, complaining about how views are being pushed upon him.

Yet he also goes to CNN, which was shown to be colluding with the Clinton campaign (and runs overwhelmingly slanted coverage. Something like 90% negative on Trump, hugely positive for Obama.)

He's picking his preferred poison. But he's not getting a balanced world-view, if that's what he's after.

1 comments

The point I made about Trump wasn’t about views being pushed on me. It was that Twitter’s TOS was being changed to allow him to bypass those policies.

As for the CNN reference, you’re cherry-picking. I also note going to HN and Bless This Stuff. I provide these as honest examples of where I find myself going to waste time. I didn’t at any point say these provided a more “balanced world-view”.