Is it envy or lack of understanding related to financial engineering? Or, is it a threat to traditional models, aka disrupting the status quo?
1 comments
It's skepticism of what looks awfully like a bubble/ponzi scheme. Your question is predicted on the premise that crypto is necessarily a good investment, but some are skeptical that the underlying work has any value beyond authentication, whereas government-backed fiat currencies are notionally and practically backed by promises of actual resources.