back

by bbayles·8y ago·view on hn ↗
You're absolutely right about this. This is almost certainly just there to block people who mistakenly paste in an example configuration somewhere.

Back in 2010 there were problems that came up when IANA started allocating out of 1.0.0.0/8 (e.g. [1]). Things that were once assumed to be unused started being used, leading to strange issues.

Also, why on earth would AT&T block 1.1.1.1 and not Google DNS and OpenDNS?

[1] https://bgpmon.net/issues-with-allocating-from-1-0-0-08/

2 comments
According to the thread the timing on this looks pretty bad since those DNS IPs were previously working on the earlier firmware.
How would it make sense to block it only on a small fraction of their entire network? It wouldn't accomplish anything.
when 1.1.1.1 was first announced a few weeks ago, many people pointed out at the time that it was already blocked because so many people had effectively polluted it by over-using it for demo examples and testing traffic. CF announced they knew this and intended to do a project analyzing the data. Perhaps this done, whether conveniently or not, with the same intention. We'll see if they reverse it.