True. And you have children. Better to exist than not exist.
back
1 comments
You're both violating the community standards here (by calling people idiots) and really reaching by suggesting that a methodological paper about inferring information from C. elegans literature is somehow a clear rebuttal to the parent post.
Community sometimes has very little to do with what's true.
This guy sounds like a bot using some sort of generative NN with "toxicity" turned up to 11
Bingo, in part. We're also trying to determine who does not value existence.
Who is your creator, droid?
Hm, what an absolutely dimwitted and obtuse "scientist". I hope your career crashes and burns. You want to be heard? Make yourself a pleasure to be heard. I cannot believe you got anyone to work with you.
Yes. Also true is that toxic dialog does not move the discussion forward.