I can remember watching Mister Rogers on TV a bit when I was younger, but only through reruns (I'm a child of the '90s), and not very regularly. Until recently, he was a faint memory in the back of my mind. He comes up now and again when there are terrible events (as the article mentions), but I wouldn't say he was a defining figure in my early development.
After seeing the movie, I can only wish that I had had more of him and his show in my life. He was truly dedicated to producing emotionally educational television for children. I think we could do with more of that these days. Children's shows just aren't what they used to be.
I think I'd give the biography a 9 out of 10. Not because it's some incredible feat of cinematic achievement, but because the message is so crucially important. Do yourself a favor and go see it.
It's a very different format from Mr Roger's, but maybe it has to be in order to be relevant to the ages.
Incidentally she didn't know that Daniel Tiger was from Mr Rogers until we saw the biography together. (She never watched Mr Rogers's Neighborhood when she was younger, and had only heard of him through pop culture.)
I grew up in the 90s watching PBS all the time. PBS was pure magic at that time with Ghostwriter, Carmen San Deigo, Sesame Street. Mr. Rogers was my favorite program overall. I always stopped to watch him. He just made you feel calm and collected.
I just recently watched an episode on YouTube and I ended up getting teary-eyed watching it. His simple little show was so impactful. So many great memories and morals I have learned from this show. So good.
I'm afraid to go to the movie. I feel I will be sobbing uncontrollably at the end.
it would be a fun stat to track government spending on military vs children. i dont even want to know the results.
Fred Rogers saw the power in doing something different, and eloquently expressed that to the committee... although it's a little scary how much power that one man on the committee seemed to have over this incredibly powerful resource for children and adults.
And third: "Think of the children" is a classic fallacy all in itself, that bears no further explanation
I can also understand why we might not want to spend government money to produce the shows.
Toddlers are being arbitrarily kidnapped and kept in cages, and 40% of this country just shrugs it off. Your comment is being downvoted without rebuttal. Etc. Etc.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1419727729/ref=ox_sc_sfl_t...
(not affiliated, etc)
Watching Mr. Rogers growing up really helped me handle tough situations growing up. It may sound weird but I remain calm, under pressure, under crisis, etc. I try to remind people of the positives the have and to work through the negatives without spreading negative energy.
Edit: I didn't realize the documentary was still in theaters! That is my plan for tonight then...
"Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’ The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no commandment greater than these.”
Jesus in the book of Mark 12:30-31
The "take others for exactly who they are" mentality captures his earnestness and utter lack of guile in his interactions. I'm sure you've seen him testify before the Senate Subcommittee on Communications to maintain funding for PBS [0], but I'll leave this link here anyway, for others who might not have seen this.
So does anyone know how to view/buy/rent a large (complete?) collection of all those wonderful old episodes? I would like to re-watch these with young family members. I'd happily buy a big Blu-ray or DVD set but I didn't see such a thing available on PBS' site.
It's a really touching movie. I came away struck by the quiet radicalism of Rogers' mission to simply validate other human beings, especially children. He seemed to have honed the ability to climb the wall we put up to protect ourselves once we learn that we're on our own in this world, as that world invariably let's us down by ignoring us and invaliditating our dignity.
I was pleasantly surprised to see Jeff Erlanger in the film. He was a friend from when I was in grad school at Wisconsin - really a lovely soul.
*My original post should say director, not author.
Reminds me of a srsly good podcast episode about Mr. Rogers: https://srslywrong.com/podcast/ep-131-the-genius-of-mr-roger...
I really wish there were more episodes available. She finds him captivating.
https://www.amazon.com/Mister-Rogers-Neighborhood-Volume-1/d...
And there are a ton on PBS Kids for free:
(inserts random paragraph about incels, misogyny and the fear of being shot at for being a woman)
Talk about a big-lipped alligator moment.
> Visiting the archives of Canada’s public broadcaster this past May was more complex than usual due to increased security in the building. Five days after Alek Minassian had killed ten people and injured multiple others by driving a white van through a crowd, Canadaland reported that a post had appeared on the Incels.me message board with the subject, “[Serious] our next task: shooting up CBC headquarters.”
Rogers (I learned from this article) got his start on the CBC.
Honestly this was clearly the intention just from reading the paragraph in question.
The point of the piece: Mr. Rogers provides a model of maleness and masculinity that works especially well for boys and men who feel scared, alienated, or attacked by society. This model, rooted in love, contrasts with other models for that subpopulation that ground out in anger or hate.
In other words, the very thesis of the piece is that there is a salient relationship between incels/mysogyny and Mr. Rogers: the latter provides an alternative to the former.
The generic term being non-sequitur I would say.
Where in the world did this come from in an article about Fred Rogers? The author sounds unstable. What a loaded article.