back

by magnetic·8y ago·view on hn ↗
I think the way it is meant to be interpreted as is "inflicting terror", not necessarily in the strict political sense.

Basically it's sneaky, can hit anytime, you don't know how to find & target it, when it's going to attack, where it's going to come from, and what suffering it's going to cause (but you know it's going to be bad). It seems to me the metaphor is quite apt.

Personally, I didn't feel like the usage detracted from the article at all.

I'm not sure why it causes such a strong feeling of "hate". Mild disappointment perhaps, but hate?

1 comments
Upon reflection, it annoys me so much because the label "terrorist" has become so misused in propaganda. Friends are "freedom fighters" and enemies are "terrorists". Regardless of the actual merits of their cases. I'm just very tired of it.