I think the delay between the work, and the Nobel is very odd. I think well before the 2000s anyone in the field would have known the import of the work.
The science museum in London had a very nice display of the concepts using a clear lucite rod with a bend, and a light at one end. It was remarkably well done with all kinds of cute museum tricks to 'show' the bent light inside the pipe. I think the modernisation they did in the 90s or later got rid of this kind of thing, which is a damn shame.
A slightly more cynical person would say that the Nobel committee is not really interested in awarding prizes for this sort of work.
Not to mention the fact that he also won a Nobel.
Mr. Kao contributed some amazing advances in a field kickstarted by perhaps even madder scientists before him.
The story of the foundational work in Fiber Optics by the group a decade earlier (Bram Van Heel, Harold Hopkins, Narinder Singh Kapany, etc) is worth learning about at a time of reflection to appreciate Mr. Kao's contributions. Some are still alive today.
Science, and the Nobel folks are also revealing in how those who who laid a foundation for Fibre Optics almost a decade earlier don't seem as well known.
It reminds me of how our society has benefitted greatly because of less known individuals due to recognition (until recently) like Nikola Tesla.