Not everyone. Everyone I knew shunned facebook, laughed at myspace, looked down on youtube, you get the idea. For us, it was so odd that people would use their real identities and put their lives online. I think that period marked the true shift of the internet from a tech oriented population to the "normie" population.
I've never had a facebook, myspace or youtube account and never will.
> Now there are so many attacks on the company politically, technically, and socially that I wonder if Facebook will be able to recover its trust with the community?
There were similar attacks on social media back then too but not as vocal or widespread. Facebook, instagram and whatsapp are still growing so I'm guessing they will be fine.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly...
Though I think facebook ( and the nytimes for that matter ) are toxic useless enterprises that humanity would be better off without, I don't think it or the nytimes are going anywhere anytime soon.
Also, keep in mind that facebook is banned in china and if zuckerberg can get his foot in the door, they may have another decade of significant growth.
https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerberg-visits-china...
User would be required to signup with their id card ; and in case they screw up, would be hold accountable. It would allow to purge the network from a lot of shady practices, from users as well as advertisers and the organisation itself.
It makes no sens a private company owns the public sphere and the public discourse.
Nice work. I don't know why people are voting you down.
Preferring different methods of communication doesn't make you smarter or a leader. It means you have different preferences, nothing more.
Most people don't use those sites out of educated choice -- they got manipulated into using them and would want to leave if they knew what the sites were doing.