back
7 comments
If we have the ability to increase the intelligence of our offspring, is it ethical NOT to?
Assuming there aren't large side effects (such as creating a monoculture and then large-scale death because of a novel disease that targets a weakness), to me the answer is obvious. I would do it in a heartbeat - but only if that risk is mitigated somehow.
I agree
What about all the people that can't afford to make their babies super smart? Their kids would quickly become second-class citizens, and it would get worse from there.

That being said, if this tech existed (and was proven safe) I would hold off having children until I could afford it for each one.

Can't you make the same argument about education?
Two words: "Unintended consequences"
That's a different problem.