back

by denzil_correa·7y ago·view on hn ↗
> the unreasonable simplicity of fundamental physics.

How do you measure simplicity and how did you come up to the conclusion that fundamental physics was "simple"?

1 comments
When physicists (and mathematicians) say a system is simple they usually mean that it exhibits features such as the following:

– High degree of symmetry: laws that govern the system are invariant under various transformations

– Reducibility: complex entities can be understood as being composed of building blocks governed by a smaller set of rules instead of being irreducible, ”ontologically basic”

– Differentiability: the way the system evolves can be modeled using differential equations and other tools of analysis

– Low order of approximation: the behavior of the system can be approximated by power series with a small number of terms; higher-order terms converge quickly

– Small number of free parameters: the laws of the system do not require a large number of ad-hoc parameters with arbitrary values

For a completely rigorous definition of simplicity, we can introduce the Kolmogorov complexity of an object, defined as the length of the shortest computer program (in some agreed-on encoding) that produces the object as output when run.