back

by jasonpeacock·7y ago·view on hn ↗
IMO, this is an improvement - it makes it clear that the bucket is global and public, whereas with the path you could believe that it was only visible when logged into your account.

It also helps people understand why the bucket name is restricted in it's naming.

1 comments
> it makes it clear that the bucket is global and public

How does it do that? You can host a private bucket at foo.s3.amazonaws.com just fine.

I think the claim is that the namespace is global and public, i.e., you and I can't both have buckets named "foo". There is only one S3 bucket named "foo" in the world.

If it's https://s3.amazonaws.com/foo/ you could believe that it's based on your cookies or something, but if it's https://foo.s3.amazonaws.com/ it's more obvious that it's a global namespace in the same way DNS domain names are (and that it's possible to tell if a name is already in use by someone else, too).