- why am I opted-in to a Studies program in Firefox's default state? (With no explicit information about what it is)
- what does app.normandy.enabled switch do and why is its default value is True and doesn't change to false when I explicitly state I don't want to be in the Studies program?
- why can't we see any xpi's installed by studies program unless we explicitly go to about:studies?
I don't say chromium is better, but I think we deserve an explanation regarding these points.
While these deserve an explanation, you should not wait to move.
Chrome is spyware that does web browsing. It's parent company also shows ads, all the time.
Chrome's auto update not only allows them to silently update or change your browser, it allows them to silently install other software on your computer.
Firefox is a browser. It can auto-update in a way that may be questionable, but it also has a lot of cranky devs looking over their shoulder to call them out years later because Mr. Robot may have been able to show them an ad. FF deserves to be called out on their mistakes, and need offer an explanation. But perspective!
Why would you not move now?
I came here to mention exactly this. I don't mind the certificate issue (as long as there is a post mortem and they learn something from it).
I was wondering how my addons came back automatically (without me having to upgrade to 66.0.4) and I found out about this studies thing, which I never consented to. I feel violated. And the problem is, what browser am I supposed to use from now on? Lynx? Sigh
ETA: I am (was) a proud Firefox user since it was called Firebird, and changing browsers never crossed my mind before (even if Chrome felt faster some times). At this exact moment, I have zero trust on Mozilla, just like I have zero trust on Google (Chrome). Extremely frustrated and disappointed.
The fact that I still can't find that it's patched now tells me nothing good about the health of the ecosystem and who it is meant to serve. That should be all the reason you need to switch to Firefox, which admittedly also has huge warts but to my mind ones that aren't quite so egregious.
[1] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ublock-origin-extr...
Take a look at https://normandy.cdn.mozilla.net/api/v1/recipe/
Looking Glass is a collaboration between Mozilla and the makers of Mr. Robot to provide a shared world experience
Mozilla wants to know more about knowledge and opinions of news on the Web.
Etc.
There are also links to what seems to be internal documentation.
It shocked me the interest and the infrastructure they have just for collecting information. This is not just a couple of developers trying to figure out what feature is used and/or studying bugs.
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-...
https://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/ You can see how it's made here: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnuzilla.git/tree/makeicec...
Note that it looks like it disables sync, but that should still work, and you can add whatever addons you like.
[1]: https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/mobile/releases/
EDIT it's up: https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/mobile/releases/66.0.4/
I know this was a mistake, but I can't help but be mad that their proprietary built in stuff effectively gets a free pass and special treatment and meanwhile I can't use RSS and all my containers were deleted (those didn't come back after the study was pushed either).
Edit: To be clear, at no point did I delete the add-ons I had installed.
This is the way code-signing on Windows works, and allows you to prove that code was signed by a valid certificate while it was in its validity date - so even once the certificate expires, the code will still run as long as the cryptographic timestamping signature is valid.
However, if you find each one in the store and (re-)install them - they work again and their data is back intact as expected.
Container support (with Containerise), a dedicated search bar to use with DDG bangs, and easy 'send tab to device' is what has me holding on today.
But I have to admit that Microsoft's eventual offering is pretty appealing, a Chromium-based browser with the advantages of Chrome's compatibility and Edge's conservative battery sipping. I'm one who has always liked and even preferred Microsoft's products and their integration on as objective of a basis as a human can muster. Even if it's in different aspects, I think they're going to probably have Edge become a package equally appealing to the things I love about Firefox. Edge/Safari are definitely where I'll go if Firefox really starts circling the drain, but having been on FF since it was Phoenix, it'll take more than this debacle.
So this fix is not complete.
Our efforts in getting Firefox users to install our extension has been in vain. "Luckily" we didn't have many users yet but imagine the amount of money this will cost bigger search engines like DDG, Qwant, etc.
How does the 66.0.4 fix the problem exactly ?
From Wikipedia:
>They [the original Phoenix devs] believed the commercial requirements of Netscape's sponsorship and developer-driven feature creep compromised the utility of the Mozilla browser.
This is crazy, and I'm really disappointed with Mozilla. I'd leave firefox right now, but I don't want to contribute to the destruction of one of the last good pieces of software not owned by Google.
I hope for Mozilla to find a source of income that isn't Google, because they did a lot for the web. Let us just hope they don't need to make too many compromises.
is there something else I need to do?