A fun and cringeworthy post. Thanks. But why withhold the make and model of alarm clock?
1. Maybe others could chime in or assist.
2. Brands that sell fragile and frustrating garbage like this should be exposed.
back
4 comments
Raymond has always had a policy of not naming-and-shaming companies in his blog, for better or worse.
Edit: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/?p=40523
>Things that increase the likelihood that your comment will be edited or deleted: ... More generally, comments that identify a specific company, program, or person.
Probably he didn't want to drag another (specific) brand through the mud on the official Microsoft dev blog. Deserved or not, it would be unprofessional.
Skimming this rant left me with the assumption that it was about "the Microsoft alarm clock" and including some more specifics would have fixed that quickly.
3. Increase my confidence that the article is actually real.
I have no way of verifying anything in this article so as far as I'm concerned it's fake. I need a picture or at least a make and model so I know the alarm clock in question actually exists.
And maybe Raymond Chen is completely fine with 'choward' of Hacker News not believing him.
Yeah... he's Raymond goddamn Chen. He's not even aware of our existence. :)
I thought the name sounded familiar, but looking on Wikipedia, there are two Ray(mond) Chens (one is a Federal judge) and neither of them seems to be this guy.
Doesn't ring a bell. Am I supposed to know who he is?
He's the author of The Old New Thing... he was heavily involved in the development of Windows and he's generally highly regarded in software development circles. He's been around for a long time.
Why would someone create a fake post explaining a frustrating situation and intentionally not share the make and model?
I actually find it more valuable that it's written this way. Rather than pointing out one brand of product as the problem, it encourages readers to keenly review a product's "features" before purchasing.
Even if it is fake, it's a simple post explaining a completely feasible, frustrating situation.
Google "wifi projection alarm clock" and one product shows up, with universally poor reviews that for the most part have trouble with the Wi-Fi not connecting, Wi-Fi stops working after 6 weeks, etc.
You have the world's largest database of consumer products at your fingertips, it's easy to verify his claims.
Thanks. Well spotted. It was annoying me that I couldn't find the extant product.
https://www.lacrossetechnology.com/c82929-connected-projecti...
A lot of devices have a hard requirement for 2.4ghz and 802.11n and the need for awareness of this is not trivial.
I have been reduced to keeping track of each mac address on my network and it seems like all the IOT devices use the same group of generic Chinese chipsets.
really? is itreally beyond belief that bullshit doodads exist?