back

by emptybits·6y ago·view on hn ↗
> “For them it was just work and that’s it.”

Is it? If someone's job is spewing cleverly provocative, disruptive, toxic, and intentionally negative messages all day ... does that edgy skill and behaviour not leak into their home or personal life?

I understand, these workers need jobs and I'm sure some get quite proficient at trolling. But my gut says there will be personal side effects from reinforcing and working your brain and interactions like this all day. :-(

5 comments
Well, you left out an important sentence just before which says:

> A majority of Cat@Net’s employees are understood to be disabled, allowing the company to derive substantial public subsidies from Poland’s National Disabled Rehabilitation Fund.

> "their disabilities mean that their employment opportunities are limited"

When you have nothing to put into the pot, the perspective changes. Some of those people might be desperate for work, and in such situation one swallows their pride.

Still, not all people would do such things. But I also imagine some of them might be underestimating the power of the work they're doing and thinking "it can't possibly lead to anything serious".

With the risk of pulling a Godwin, the “It’s just a job, so any ethics, morals or generally doing the right thing don’t apply” defense is getting kinda stale.

It’s one step away from “I was just following orders”

It sounds more like it's akin to wage slavery rather than blindly following orders. Assuming there aren't other jobs for those workers then they most likely have to chose between that job and a meagre existence based on government subsidies and goodwill of others.
Having money to buy something to eat is also the right thing to do for any individual. As one comment said, options are limited. I’m playing the devil’s advocate here but only just.
I've always said if it's your job to be an asshole, that doesn't mean you aren't an asshole, it just means you're an asshole with a job.
> If someone's job is spewing cleverly provocative, disruptive, toxic, and intentionally negative messages all day

I agree with you but I guess humans are very good at compartmentalizing their brain. Honestly, these jobs are not that different from working for defense contractors. They know their products are used to cause harm but still most people working in the defense industry manage to stay detached from the consequences of their work.

The effects of having no money and nothing to eat and nowhere to live, I assume, are much stronger than the ones you are describing.
Yeah, it's easy to profess that it's "just a job," but one carries one's work into one's private life, and ideological discourse.

It's well-understood by Marxists how the mode of production determines the cultural superstructure[1] (and vice-versa).

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_and_superstructure

> It's well-understood by Marxists how the mode of production determines the cultural superstructure[1] (and vice-versa).

It's not "understood," it's a sociological theory. Hardly hard science.

Who said anything about hard science? Just because something is well-understood by a group of people doesn't mean it has to have some sort of scientific basis to have any validity.
Well at that point, who gives a shit? It offers no predictive capability like real models.

Might as well talk about how it’s well understood by the Scientology community that it’s indicative of a required audit.