Latest commit from 7 months ago. Also, anecdotally I've heard it's not very user friendly in practice; more like a research prototype than usable software.
back
3 comments
would you care to justify a little bit? The latest version is 0.x, are you talking about bugs, or something else?
If anything, a user friendly git is what we need, not yet another tool with bad UX.
There are lots of tools out there to try and make Git simpler/more user-friendly. There's also Mercurial, which is more user-friendly while still using the same idea.
Pijul is meant to model asynchronous work as just that, whereas Git forces it into a unique history. For example, in Pijul, "pull --rebase" and "pull" produce different history, but are guaranteed by design to produce the same result, and strictly equivalent repositories (there's actually just one command for both).
This difference is fundamental.
Fossil?