I wonder how art experts would assess these paintings in a blinded experiment ("blinded" figuratively, of course ;-)
back
1 comments
I'd bet most of them are quite "low quality art", but interesting anyway...
plus, afaik, generally the image itself is not that important, as is the story behind it, if you have a story, a black square is a masterpiece, if you don't, it's junk...
OK so next step train AI on story generation for the art :)
The "story" aspect of art is bullshit, unless the art itself tells that story in a tangible way. If there's a story behind a black square, it's still just a black square.
I disagree.
A piece is more than just itself, there is a history to each one and that story adds to the piece. Some (honestly most) pieces and stories just are not very interesting, maybe even to the artist, and that is fine. And some are interesting to just some people at some times.
Art 'speaks' to each person differently, or sometimes not at all. Art is what you make of it. If you make nothing of some forms of art, that is on you. If you make nothing of all forms of art, you may want to consider why so many other humans feel so strongly the other way.
Though pretentious, ArtAssignment on YT is a great into to the wider world of art. I really think you should give it a try:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLdGqz6dgvIzbBxo7XJHnO...