Half baked and complex are hardly descriptions that endorse their process:
> It’s not perfect. We ship too many features, many half-baked. The product is complex, with many blind alleys. It’s hard to integrate non-engineers – they aren’t valued.
> It’s not perfect. We ship too many features, many half-baked. The product is complex, with many blind alleys. It’s hard to integrate non-engineers – they aren’t valued.
> But, we ship.
That in particular meant I viewed the article as a cry for help.
But it seems like all the commentary here thinks it is sincere and not an ironic piece?