▲ 265 points
back
50 comments
Interesting the author mentions he is inspired by MVP.css[0]. I am in the process of changing my home page yet again to remove the current CSS framework I used. No more classes. After a few months not touching my site I find don't understand my own web site. Interestingly I still remember HTML elements I learnt in late 90s. I am sticking to styling HTML and will use one of the minimalist CSS frameworks that have been popping up on HN[1][2] of late. I see this can be used with pandoc, I just installed pandoc yesterday to see if I should use pandoc as my static site generator. Look forward to trying this out.
[0]https://andybrewer.github.io/mvp/ [1]https://github.com/dohliam/dropin-minimal-css [2]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23220081
I find all of these css framworks baffling. They're like "this simplifies everything all you need is
<div class="s-m c-5 m-20 pl-10 ma ta-l">
<p class="fw-b lha mt-4 c-2 f>Hello, World!</p>
</>
and…what??
I MVP looks cool, will check that out
Heh reminds me of assembly.
This looks great!!
I love the simplicity of the bar charts.
I'm just wondering how the line chart is actually more accessible than an inline SVG of the same chart. You go through a lot of trouble creating lots of <div> tags, but you could also just emit an SVG with ARIA annotations (or alternatively some hidden HTML that is read by accessibility tools).
Agreed. This is nice work. Recently dropped in Chart.js for an internal rails application to throw up some charts for users to get a better view of their data on their dashboard and they were blown away. A few simple bar charts and graphs can do wonders.
Good point about the line chart. There are a few other ways I considered as well: using a clip-path to make an area chart, or using borders of rotated divs for each segment. I had not seen it done with background gradients the way I did it, and honestly I wanted to try it that way and got caught up in it. I may revisit the other methods and see if I can make something simpler.
I've never tried to read a SVG with a screen reader, do they attempt to read SVG's?
I would assume it would just treat it as an image.
Screen readers read SVG's.
https://developer.paciellogroup.com/blog/2013/12/using-aria-...
Functionality looks decent, but the 3 different names for this project are a bit too "cute" for my taste.
Url is https://rbitr.github.io/ChartS.css/
It refers to itself as C:greenheart:SS.css (what?)
Aka ChartSS.css - clever, but neither descriptive or memorable.
Edit: The fact that I can't even rag on the name in the comments due to the emoji makes me feel more justified in my original assessment. :P
Yeah, calling something accessible and then sticking an emoji in the name which screws over people with screenreaders is classic.
Thanks everybody for all the feedback. Lots of things for me to clean up I see - it's great to have people looking at it
The markdown generation in ingenious. This will integrate well with static site generators, and the charts are extremely lightweight.
I posted a Show HN a while back for charting project that is also minimal (zero) dependency, in a sense: https://github.com/typpo/quickchart
It's a web service that takes a Chart.js config and renders the chart as an image. Downsides compared to this: not accessible, not as lightweight. Upsides: works in email clients (most of which disable flexbox) and other embedding situations, more customization via Chart.js
Thanks for sharing this, I like this idea a lot. I had been playing around with using whktml to make image files out of the ChartSS.css charts for situations that require them. Having a web service like this is a cool solution.
I might need this at https://seekwell.io/ soon. I was going to render things with a headless browser, but this would be much simpler.
Curious, how do you rate limit? IP address?
Yes, the free API is rate limited by IP. Feel free to reach out if I can help (email in profile)
I like that and might use it for my markdown note-taking app.
However, it seems that there's an alignment issue between the axis' values and their points (or bars) on the graphs. The stacked bars total value is 95, yet it seems to go a bit over 100, and the problem is even more apparent on Line and Scatter plots. Nothing too major to fix I guess.
The non rounding on axis values (0, 20, 39.9, ... 99.8) is also a bit weird. Sorry I don't want to sound negative, I'm really interested and will keep an eye on it!
Thanks for the feedback - I agree that I need to do some work on how the axes scale and where the ticks go, and I see the bug you are talking about with the axis being greater than the sum. I think it is due to the placement of the tick. The very top of the axis is 99.8 but the label gets placed a bit lower so it looks like that. Will sort that out.
You don't have to override the template in the lua code to include the mvp.css file. use --css argument to set the location of the css file. it can even take multiple arguments (one for mvp.css and one for chartss.css).
In the current state, your "function Doc(" block upsets existing pandoc workflows.
Edit: didn't want to sound harsh with only the criticism :) Thank you for showing how to use lua-filters to do really cool stuff. I've playing with lua-filters, but your code is a clear example of how to extend markdown with a mini-DSL.
Edit 2: Sent you a PR on github with what I was suggesting here.
Interesting! The project url is a little confusing, I think you should rename to rbitr/ChartSS.css (double S). To match the project name.
> Stacked Bar (a pie chart for grownups)
That made me laugh, but the scale on the y-axis is odd. The inputs are all integers but the generated tick labels are floats (e.g., <span class="TickLabel" style="--tick-label:'99.8'"></span>).
Please don't use ultra light font weights, they are not accessible
One job I got into some fights with marketing and our "design experts" over this because they decided the marketing image of the company was "light and airy" and so they wanted an ultra light font weight everywhere. It was their branding font they wanted for both headers and body text. (The were so focused on ultra-light fonts, to the point where they were even trying to get rid of the option to use strong text in the middle of paragraphs. If Outlook/Word allowed a group policy to disable the Bold button, they'd probably have taken it away. Haha.)
It took a lot of convincing that a software developer would know basic typography enough to know it was a bad idea, much less was I able to convey that it was an accessibility nightmare. I had to use some CSS tricks to get that work done and psychologically "show" that things were still "light and airy" while using reasonable font-weights for body text, and in the end they still didn't entirely believe me about the accessibility issues.
Couldn't people just set their user agents to ignore or replace lightweight fonts with standard ones?
I guess you are talking about user stylesheets and not user agents. Yes, they could but there's a lot of lightweight fonts you'd have to hardcode.
Also that's not possible on (most) mobile browsers and it shouldn't be something people have to do just to be able to read something in the first place.
Yeah the color choices for the graph are questionable too. They definitely don't pass contrast tests.
Love the syntax 10 out of 10. Visual design wise it’s not bad, but could be better. If I have some time I would love to contribute some add-one people could use for a different theme of designs.
This is really nice, great job!
I'm a real sucker for simple markdown text that can be turned into something that non-technical folks can find appealing.
This looks great! I wanted to do something similar to keep my site JS free, but this looks way better than what I had in mind. Thanks!
Shouldn’t the charts be keyboard accessible?
What do you mean by that? (I would expect that question for focusable elements, but the charts don't appear to have any focus-elements?)
This article suggests that the individual parts of the chart should be keyboard navigable:
Nice !
For very basic bar charts the meter HTML element could be used but it is ackward to style unfortunately...
.md and .css together like peanut-butter and jelly. good job :)
This is really nice! Well done OP!
Another JS optional charting library I've been keeping my eye on: Pancake, from the creator of Svelte.
Experimental, pre-release: https://pancake-charts.surge.sh
Documentation is TODO
Why do people do this? If you're going to bother to make a project public with a big page demonstrating what it can do, why would you skip the part where you tell people how?
It really comes off as amateur. I have other things to do with my time than reverse-engineer your code.
It really comes off as amateur. I have other things to do with my time than reverse-engineer your code.
Perhaps the authors, who were generous enough to share the results of their work, have better things to do than to handhold you through review of their work.
Then their work probably isn't worthwhile to adopt, given the plethora of alternatives. If their time is limited so that no documentation is produced, dropping bugfixes seem to be next (IME).
Unless those authors are specifically trying to get you to adopt their work for whatever reason (sales, good will, etc) and in which case they'd likely have documented it, you are not doing them a favor by adopting their work. You're just benefiting from what they've released.
It's like going to a free buffet and complaining there's no napkins. Sure, you can complain, and you're technically correct that there should be napkins. But it's still in bad taste.
If there is no desire to have adoption, then there is no compelling reason to host publically outside of convenience. We fundamentally agree, I think, with the difference of our thought being that we have a "show hn" post (I assume from the author?) which is an invitation to test, critique, and or adopt. Of course, the OP's relationship to the author flavors this expectation, and I could be in error.
Experimental charting library for Svelte
If anything, it's more amateur to document an experimental API you know will be continually broken until a stable release in the distant future.
They don't want people to start relying on it.
It's a pre-release experimental library.
Just so you know, that name won‘t fly in Europe. Google „SS“ if you want to know why.
How long are we going to “ban” certain abbreviations for? Two generations? Three?
It seems absurd that a two letter combination not used for nearly a century is enough to disqualify a name on an entire continent.
We won. It’s over. We can reclaim their terms and symbolism now.
Not saying it sells like hot cakes in Germany, but reclaimed for a while now:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Isis
It's even funnier because the Islamic State uses lots of Toyota Hilux
I get where you’re coming from. Just know that at least in Germany, no company will ever use or support your library/product publicly with a name like that.
If you don’t care, that’s fine.