back

by TMWNN·6y ago·view on hn ↗
>In black and white photos and crackly films shot through with static, a classic image of the United States at the turn of the last century emerges: a near constant rush of immigrants, most destined to pass through Ellis Island. There they were given a cursory disease check, questioned, and in most cases, allowed to proceed on their journeys inward. This was easy enough to do without a global standard for identifying documents. Now, as immigration policy takes center stage worldwide, it’s hard to imagine just how they got through without them.

This is misleading, because it gives the impression that the US back then had open borders in those pre-passport days. It did not, at least at Ellis Island and its counterparts at other port cities. Those disease checks were cursory because all such were cursory c. 1900.

More relevant, no one was allowed in, regardless of health check, unless they could prove that they had either financial resources to support themselves, or a US sponsor willing to provide such support. Ocean liner companies like Cunard, White Star, and Hamburg American prescreened their passengers, because those turned away were the transport companies' responsibility to carry back. (The same goes for airlines today.)

1 comments
"...no one was allowed in, regardless of health check, unless they could prove that they had either financial resources to support themselves, or a US sponsor willing to provide such support"

That's an extremely low bar compared to the situation today. Getting a work visa is expensive and difficult (presently impossible as the Trump administration has shut down H1B and L1 visas).

If you do get a non-immigrant work visa and want to apply for permanent residency, the wait times for green cards are up to 50 years, depending on your country of origin.

Low bar for Northwestern Europeans - almost no-one else was allowed in until the Hart-Celler Act of 1965. The article is again misleading in implying the pre-Hart-Celler Act restrictions were only enacted with the Emergency Quota Act of 1921, when in fact it was US policy stretching back to the first Naturalization Act of 1790.
The Naturalization Act of 1790 (http://rs6.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=001/l...) limited gaining US citizenship to "free white"s, but said nothing about entry of others.

With some exceptions (such as the Chinese Exclusion Act), national/ethnic-based restrictions for entry into the US did not come about until the Emergency Quota Act of 1921, the purpose of which was to maintain the US's ethnic balance as of the 1910 census. It had many, many exceptions (such as the skilled of any race) and exemptions (all of Latin America, for example). None of the above changed the Ellis Island restrictions I mentioned: No proof of financial support (whether of oneself of from another), no entry.

> the wait times for green cards are up to 50 years, depending on your country of origin.

Ok, I'm going to press X to doubt. Going by the US Visa bulletin(https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/v...) the longest wait is 24 years for F3-class from Mexico. Obviously that isn't good but let's not pretend that it's anywhere near 50 years.

The poster is right, though it takes a bit more work than briefly scanning the visa bulletin to figure it out.

The poster is likely referring to employment 2nd and 3rd preference workers of Indian nationality. The visa bulletin has a current wait time of 11 years. However, that is saying that someone who entered the line 11 years ago will qualify today. In the last 11 years vastly more Indian nationals have entered the green card line than have been processed out of it. It's not 100% clear how long someone who enters the line today will have to wait, but 50 years is a reasonable guess given the numbers.