back

by calvinmorrison·6y ago·view on hn ↗
I'd just take a look at some patches out there. There's a lot of usability tweaks existing for acme.

however I still think acme is a conflagration of confusion. It has programs, inside of it, it's a text editor, a terminal, but breaks the interface of /dev/draw so it doesn't properly multiplex by rio.

Often stated, and I imagine to be true, acme was to be a full replacement for rio almost, but it ends up falling short of that.

1 comments
I am not bothered by acme / rio issues, since I use acme on plan9port.

However, I have been maintaining a set of patches, including up/down and additional goodies such as bindings for save, copy, cut, paste. Some of them are actually hard coded for Mac (cmd modifier), but not for Linux. It’s workable.

The golang port, edwood, features the same limitations, in my opinion.