back

by kristjansson·6y ago·view on hn ↗
I don’t like this response.

It’s completely reasonable to assess the quality of informational content without assuming a duty to proofread and revise that content.

Especially when the issue that might be corrected isn’t a typo or malapropism but ‘this whole thing isn’t that great.’

1 comments
Sure, I’m not saying that you have to correct it. Just that the project doesn’t assume that they have correct answers for everything and expect some participation of “the community” at large.