back
1 comments
The underlying "study" is chock full of design flaws and interpretation weaknesses mentioned in Peter Norvig's article about how to spot problems with research studies.

http://norvig.com/experiment-design.html

I would look for MUCH more replication of this finding across other data sets before supposing that there is any advantage to dyslexia. (P.S., the incidence rate for dyslexia in the general population reported in the thought-provoking submitted article is just one of several reasons I'm doubtful about the factual claims in the article.)