In fact, I've often suggested that the real solution is this. Elections and the electoral system are in the public interest, so why not fund it 100% publicly? The FEC sets aside a budget for anyone who gets a certain number of signatures of endorsement. They can spend that, and only that. They get a set amount of time on all TV stations. Nobody is allowed to donate publicly or privately. Elections are argued on their merits not on their budgets.
If it's shown to benefit a candidate, it's a crime, and you face civil and potentially criminal penalties.
That’s naive. Media is owned by a few folks. There’s nothing to stop Murdoch from broadcasting/publishing the names of only the person that Murdoch wants to win. And you’ll never hear about the little Green Party lady that YOU want to win, and you can’t donate to help her out.
You can cap TV time for funded spots, but the talking heads on radio and TV will just keep mentioning how great Candidate Y is.
Yes, there is, make it illegal.
> You can cap TV time for funded spots, but the talking heads on radio and TV will just keep mentioning how great Candidate Y is.
I'm sure after the FCC issues the first few fines they'll settle right down.
At the end of the day, all of these roadblocks can be bowled over, its just a matter of how much you want it.
My opinion is that someone should file the proper case(s) that would eventually lead to SCOTUS overturning the Citizens United ruling. Then we should move to publicly-funding races. And we should DEFINITELY remove PAC money from justice races (why is that even a thing?).
But this country has a long history of increasingly corrupt government cranking out pork barrel projects and ignoring us little people. That will not change any time soon unfortunately, without a massive revolution.