back
4 comments
At least they've got enough fear of high energy ball mills that they aren't making mixed oxide.
What 2015 Accords?

Four out the seven participants have not conformed to the JCPOA since Trump killed the JCPOA in 2018. Iran held out for another 12 months, then thought "Stuff 'em. They're not doing it, so why should I?"

The US withdrew from the deal in 2018 and reimposed the U.S. sanctions, effectively ending the deal. It would make sense for Iran not to comply with the deal until the U.S. informs that they want to joins the deal again.
The deal was flawed from the start:

The news from the nuclear talks with Iran was already troubling. Iran was being granted the “right to enrich.” It would be allowed to retain and spin thousands of centrifuges. It could continue construction of the Arak plutonium reactor. Yet so thoroughly was Iran stonewalling International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors that just last Thursday the IAEA reported its concern “about the possible existence in Iran of undisclosed . . . development of a nuclear payload for a missile.”

Bad enough. Then it got worse: News leaked Monday of the elements of a “sunset clause.” President Obama had accepted the Iranian demand that any restrictions on its program be time-limited. After which, the mullahs can crank up their nuclear program at will and produce as much enriched uranium as they want.

Sanctions lifted. Restrictions gone. Nuclear development legitimized. Iran would reenter the international community, as Obama suggested in an interview in December, as “a very successful regional power.” A few years — probably around 10 — of good behavior and Iran would be home free.

The agreement thus would provide a predictable path to an Iranian bomb. Indeed, a flourishing path, with trade resumed, oil pumping and foreign investment pouring into a restored economy.

Meanwhile, Iran’s intercontinental ballistic missile program is subject to no restrictions at all. It’s not even part of these negotiations.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-fatal-flaw-in-th...

You negotiate with a hostile foreign power from a position of strength, not weakness. The deal gave Iran everything it wanted, removed the sanctions that were cratering its economy, and gave them the keys to the kingdom without so much as a slap on the hand. The US negotiated from a position of weakness. It handed over everything without getting anything in return, and it was the right move to withdraw from the deal and impose the sanctions, putting the US back into a position of power from which to negotiate from.