> I remember when the AGPL was being talked about in around 2008 or so, and thinking it was ludicrous. Now I wonder if it's too lenient.

It'd be really hard to come up with a license less lenient than AGPL without it being non-FOSS, which would defeat the purpose.

> Maybe what we need is a 'no AWS' license, think Apache License but with a clause that says no corporation with more than $50B in revenue can resell it.

This would be a blatant violation of freedom 0.