Wire transfers in Canada (even domestic ones) are not available in online personal banking. You have to show up in a branch or call. Either way you will have to pay stupid amount of money for one. Someone receiving one will also have to pay "administrative fee" for the privilege - iirc it was $10-20 per wire transfer.
All you have are "email transfers" using Interac, which are usually capped at $3000 per transfer & per day.
So cheques. For everything that you can't/won't pay with CC. Rent? Write your landlord some cheques, preferably in advance for the duration of the lease, etc.
After moving to Canada almost a decade ago it felt like I was experiencing late 90's EU banking all over again, except European banking was rapidly evolving then and the only improvement I've seen in Canadian banking in close to 10 years were:
- I could set online banking password longer than 8 characters and use characters other than letters (I'm serious)
- I can cash a cheque by taking photos of it with a mobile app
The only 2FA available for personal banking is still SMS and you have those dumb "security" questions everywhere.
Facebook post: "The name of your mother and your favourite colour is your rapper name. What is it?"
There is also a special type of cheques (inconveniently amd generically named "cheque de banque") , which blocks the amount entirely on the issuer side, which guarantees that receiver will actually get the money. Quite useful when you don't want to walk around with huge pile of cash, because bank wire takes days and you don't want to make one before seeing the goods
> because bank wire takes days
Wow that's some stone-age trash. I haven't encountered such garbage in one other EU country in 20 years.
Wait what? I thought there was a European regulation that bank wires must be completed in less than 24 hours? Or was that Germany only? Most wiring from a German to another German account happens instantly nowadays.
SEPA Instant Credit Transfer is probably what you're thinking about, but it's not universally supported by every bank yet.
Here it's the older more establishment banks dragging their heels.
In the US we have cashiers checks which are pretty much the same as you described. I’ve used them to buy cars.
This is usually called a "bank draft" or a "cashier's cheque" in other places. But yes, there are still probably some use cases for it.
I don't understand why we can mobile deposit checks, but using a bank app generated and signed jpg check isn't an option.
Email, txt, or even print-mail-deposit.
Recipients could do the same. Mobile deposit app opens the file instead of taking a picture, automatically stamp your endorsement, submit, done. Or print and deposit.
It could have been so simple.
That is to say, other countries have already done it.
1. https://newseventsinsights.wearepay.uk/media/e1mdcljg/pay-uk...
I have heard a horror story from a friend who was on holiday in NYC who can't pay at a certain store (I forgot what store, sorry) because the terminals are signature-only (and the card is PIN-only because that makes a lot more sense).
Edit: If I remember correctly, it was resolved by getting a cash advance on an ATM, which a) works precisely because there's a PIN, and b) is frustrating to him because it adds up unnecessary (if the terminal worked) fees.
I think the last one I saw was some government agency refunding me 2 odd EUR in the early 00s and I forgot to cash it in for like a decade. (This is all in Germany.)
The big(ger) banks owned fleets of enormous OCR machines that could read and sort cheques at hundreds per second, and hundreds of employees to read the cheques that the machines couldn't. I was on a team that were supporting the rollout and testing a new set of these machines.
I don't know if this is still the case today, but I was surprised then to learn they were still paper backed.
It’s mostly just app-based now, but they still exist.
In reality nobody will accept these.
Actually cheaper to send people a penny with a comment attached than send an SMS :D
It's a dream, other than the UX issue of not being very easy to set up new recipients as you need to know account details and generally there's a lot of friction to prevent fraud/mistakes (ie, it wouldn't be very good at a shop).
If it's something to be invoiced, the invoice will have their IBAN and a reference code to add, which works more like you describe.
In practice, it means Nigeria has more retail corruption than most places.
The most corrupt countries, by take, are the US and China, but it is concentrated at the top. In China, top-level violations of the law are tolerated as a carrot-and-stick to maintain support for the regime, whereas in the US, top-level corruption is instead made wholly legal.
Russia and North Korea would like to be the most corrupt, but simply don't handle enough money.
There are three reasons I can guess why at least the USPIS hasn't picked it up... they're overworked (and understaffed), the reports haven't made it past the gatekeepers (=been binned because it was too confusing), or there is an ongoing investigation that likely has been compromised now.
Could they charge Steve with crimes? Yeah, and I guess if they're frustrated or Steve was obnoxious and unco-operative they will. But he's a dead end, there is no route to Bx$cash$$ whoever that might be, through Steve, and so long as America is a land of morons who dream of being billionaires there will be more Steves so why even bother?