> The Wayland section is also perhaps the most technically inaccurate of the post

The author is open to valid criticism and updates the article whenever someone points inaccuracies or falsehoods.

You and the guy replying to you, both say nothing technical or factual aside from "it is all wrong or/and inaccurate". That's very hard to act upon.

> In other cases the criticism reflects broad technological trends that are equally true for other systems from the same era (e.g. client-side rasterization), and for the same motivating reasons.

Yet other systems provide a level of integration and ease of use (APIs) which are leaps and bounds above what the Wayland protocol offers. That's the main gripe.

Check this for more info: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/issues/233