back
2 comments
Is that against Twitter rules? Implying intelligence agencies would secretly do something untoward?

Edit: The cached tweet: https://www.twitter.com/HardensBetter/status/146830497599857...

Many think Epstein was connected to intelligence. Evidence includes making videos of his guests having sex with young girls, a classic intelligence entrapment technique used by every spy agency in the world, a large supply of diamonds and Austrian passport to make a quick escape.

The past 5 years has taught us that on twitter it's ok to imply (and in many cases outright state) that the sitting president of the US is a literally Russian plant) without a fear of a ban.

In a normal world this would mean you could also imply that Epstein is an intelligence asset without fear of a ban.

But this is twitter world so who knows?