Another report relying on flimsy data, ignore and wait
back
1 comments
It’s even worse, a report that they have no data at all. There’s no evidence it worse, there’s no evidence it’s better. Completely worthless non-information.
> However, the data included only 24 hospitalizations of patients suspected of having the omicron variant, with researchers saying “hospitalisation data remains very limited at this time.” The study is yet to be peer-reviewed.
As I read it, what it says is "we have no data, please ignore those people who say it's much milder, because we have no data". That's non-information in a way, but as I see it the fault is not theirs, the fault belongs to those who publish prematurely.