As for Aranese speakers, to me (I have some amount of Limousin and Provençal) native ones [2] are understandable to the same extent as other Gascon speakers, but new speakers who bring Castellan phonological features are incomprehensible. If it manages to survives in this environment, it could truly be a new language in the making.
[1]: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Isoglosas_gasc%C3%B3...
Compare with the Serbian/Croatian "languages" that are far more mutually intelligible than varieties of the Chinese "language".
I've heard that Arabic also has far more variance than is between Serbian and Croatian. Even though we often refer to it as a single language, it's actually a very diverse selection of varieties that are not all mutually intelligible.
In short, the distinction is pretty arbitrary.
Then we have "Italian" and "German". If these countries had not undergone unification in the 19th century would Duolingo be offering courses in Venetian and Bavarian?
thing is these standard versions were developed and agreed upon more or less at a time -- mid 19th century and the whole nationalist movements thing in europe -- when there was a unitarian tendency among south slavic nations. so the standard versions are (1) essentially artificial, and (2) politically motivated to an extent.
once you get on the ground level of spoken language you find far more variance within each of the two -- the regional and even local dialects are very different from each other, to the point of seemingly being whole different languages were it not for the developed standard versions that tie them together.
Linguistically, the distinction is much more objective (also it's not always clear cut, because there are asymmetries between speeches in terms of how understandable they are to each other) : two kinds of speech that are not inter-comprehensible are different languages. Dialects and sub-dialects are defined by isoglosses, see the map I link in my original post.
Arabic is, much like Chinese, both a linguistic group and a language (Modern Standard Arabic).
The rejection of considering Valencian as Catalan has some links to Blaverism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaverism a “weird” Spanish nationalist movement from Valencia with marked Anti-Catalan character.
Oficial languages in Spain are Basque, Catalan, Galician and Spanish (obviously). They survive others such as Aragonese, Bable or Extremeñu. Plus the Spanish dialects such as the Southern ones.
> [...] when the European Union wanted to approve the European Constitution, the Valencian Government did not recognise the official translation wrote in Catalan from Barcelona and forced to have one in Valencian. To preserve the language unity, the Catalan Government accepted the Valencian translation has the official Catalan translation.
Total big brother move.
Some sentences in both "languages" and English. Catalan/Valencian/English
Bon dia/Bon dia/Good morning
Avui fa bon temps/Hui fa bon temps/The weather is good today
Volem acabar amb la COVID19/Volem acabar amb la COVID19/We want to end COVID19
Sembla que plourà/Pareix que plourà/Looks like it's going to rain.
There are two difrent words in 4 sentences. I can't really see how that makes them separate languages.
That seems to hint at something not in the contiguous borders - but Llivia is still on the southern slopes from what I can tell.
Your point still stands, that the wording is strange in Wikipedia, and River Runner agrees [2] that Llívia is on the south side. I think the BBC's wording is doubly incorrect, as there are other places in Spain north of the Pyrenees, e.g. Irun [3].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Val_d%27Aran
[2] https://river-runner-global.samlearner.com/?lng=1.9755776875...
Note: only in use by the Catalan Govt. Not the Spanish Govt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tautological_place_nam...
These things seem to have one thing in common — they are areas historically isolated from one another, usually by mountains or valleys. Before cars (or even roads) were common, you could almost throw a rock at the next town over, but to actually go there would take a day or more.
Beth aranés més per ací?
Just because you don't see the benefit of the language and culture of a distinct region being maintained by its own people, doesn't mean there isn't any.
The world would certainly be worse off if we lost all the diversity in it because people only see things in terms of investment/gain but are blind to the richness of allowing people to maintain their heritage.
Besides which the only part of the article that mentions taxes is when aomeone mentioned Andorra being an independent nation and paying less taxes to be autonomous than the people of Val d'Aran pay to Spain. Additionally Catalonia, where they speak Catalan, has been trying to separate from Spain. If anything, these languages are not in "life support" at the cost of all the citizens of the nation, they are actually paying more taxes due to being a part of said nation and have all the right to keep their language- especially so given the history of the region when it comes to their treatment by "the country as a whole".
Nitpicking: Andorra doesn't "pay tax to be autonomous" to Spain, nor to France for that matters. Andorra is the oldest country in Europe whose borders haven't changed since it was created (1278). It's a tiny country but it's a sovereign country. It has its own parliament and its official language (which is neither spanish nor french but catalan).
Andorrans pay less taxes because Andorra is autonomous.
In the las regional elections party with the most votes was a non-independence party: Ciutadans.
There is a Georgian saying for this type of behaviour: do not disgrace your whole nation(with your personal arrogant attitude).
Nowadays, taxpayers money funds institutions that preserve and promote Castillian.
Maybe don’t try to kill languages and life support won’t be needed.
Also, it makes more sense to spend in preserving something fragile than to promote something already popular and strong.
I am inclined to think it is not the taxpayers money that you are after