> Graham Bruce Hancock… promotes pseudoscientific theories… An example of pseudohistory and pseudoarchaeology, his work has neither been peer reviewed nor published in academic journals.

> Mark Lehner, an American archaeologist and egyptologist, has disputed Schoch's analysis, stating, "You don't overthrow Egyptian history based on one phenomenon like a weathering profile... that is how pseudoscience is done, not real science."

> Historian Ronald H. Fritze has described Schoch as a "pseudohistorical and pseudoscientific writer".

Randall Carlson doesn’t have a wiki page.

I hope anyone who is interested in these people is listening to them out of morbid curiosity and not because they think they are deserving of any credence whatsoever. The scientific method is not optional. If you don’t use it, you’re not a scientist.

Rogan, however, appears to genuinely want to believe (and promote) these theories, whether they have any factual basis or not.