I'm confused, isn't the neighborhood who protest about these stores are also the same neighborhood who want them (that's why the stores are there in the first place)?
Or _some_ people in the neighborhood want convenience at the expense of others?
Or _some_ people in the neighborhood want convenience at the expense of others?
Neighbourhoods debate all kinds of things that some people want and others don’t: strip clubs, coffeeshops, prostitution. All are legal here, but have rules because even though presumably some people find them convenient, others less so. Does that help clear up the confusion?
Which is a way zoning laws start to be introduced.