back

by oxplot·4y ago·view on hn ↗
> So when I say they make that for profit

To say someone's doing something for money, is to imply money making is their main motivation and end goal. I'm arguing that money is the means to an end.

> You seem to consider that cars made the world a better place, that's your opinion

I probably can argue for that, but what's more important than cars themselves, is the technology, processes and innovations that came about because of the desire for personal transportation.

> But it would be hard to argue that the current climate crisis is not caused by technology.

True.

> You're just blindly hoping that more of it will magically solve the problem

Trend towards more technological societies has historically solved the issues of the past. In field of medicine alone, it's because of industrial revolution, mass production, integrated circuits, and countless other tech innovations that: we have access to all sorts of medical imaging and measurement devices that help diagnose and save people's lives; vaccine development, patient monitoring to name just a few. You look at cars and see excessive number of people moving machines. I see an entire history of innovation in mass production that high scale car manufacturing has led. Mass production is what has made possible the cheap silicon tech we have today, that goes into everything.

TL;DR you can't just pick one thing and label it good or bad. Technology is general has evidently (as piles and piles of stats show) and increasingly improved the quality of life of the world population in general.

> technology is destroying life on Earth

Earth will be destroyed even with no humans on it. In the long run, technology is the only tool for survival of life. Life will go extinct one way or another, sooner or later. We can either stay in the cave and face our doom, or get out, innovate, make mistakes and extend how long life sticks around. We can obviously make more mistakes than we need to but that's a much more nuanced conversation than "tech is bad, let's stop".

> Because we can do something cool (nobody denies that SpaceX is cool) doesn't mean we should do it.

"Something cool", just like "only for profit", is not the goal. SpaceX'es mission is to extend life beyond Earth. Making Space cool is what's needed to inspire people to join and make things happen.

1 comments
> Earth will be destroyed even with no humans on it. In the long run, technology is the only tool for survival of life.

I guess that's where we disagree. I don't care if life goes extinct in twenty thousands years. And I don't want to survive on Mars, looking back at how we destroyed most living beings there.

I don't say that technology is bad in itself. Consumerism is.