back

by andsoitis·4y ago·view on hn ↗
The article talks about the protective phenotypes hypothesis, which basically says that animals with physical or chemical traits that confer protection (e.g. armor, spines, shells, or venom) have slower aging and live longer (compared to other animals their size).

The thinking is that these protective mechanisms can reduce mortality rate (you're not getting eaten by others), so you're likely to live longer, which exerts pressure to age more slowly.

Biggest support for the protective phenotype hypothesis is in turtles.

2 comments
And these protections probably take more resources to produce, making it less advantageous to create offspring and die off.
Isn't the worry that a specie that doesn't die off will have the older generation consuming all the resources, reducing the chance at survival by the newer generation?

Also, how do these species with extremely long lifespan adapt to changing environment?

The turtles don't seem to be worried about it.