back

by itvision·3y ago·view on hn ↗
It's far from purely technical.

Wayland destroys backward compatibility, destroys everything we knew about the graphics subsystem, offers to work with graphics in a different totally new way which results in a ton of concessions.

A lot of Linux users do not use either Gnome or KDE and outside these two DEs, Wayland is a total PITA to use. I'd say it's just broken.

1 comments
This is the extremist take without any nuance that causes these flamewars without any good reason. Nothing factual, just hearsay dramatized to the max.

Wayland is backwards compatible, it literally has XWayland which is a completely transparent way of running any X application (with the caveat that these X apps can see each other, so not all of the positives of wayland apply).

Wtf, graphics subsystem? Wayland implementations use the standard kernel DRM interface - if anything xserver was always a red herring here with proprietary blobs for nvidia being part of the program itself, instead of being a separate driver.