In a March meeting, Laura Dehmlow, an FBI official, warned that the threat of subversive information on social media could undermine support for the U.S. government. Dehmlow, according to notes of the discussion attended by senior executives from Twitter and JPMorgan Chase, stressed that “we need a media infrastructure that is held accountable.”
To the author, this appears inconsequential. (Why is JPMorgan Chase, a bank that is quite conveniently heavily 'regulated', even involved in federal law enforcement discussions on social media?)
Maybe if we translate this statement, it would be easier for some people to understand:
"In a March meeting, Li Shulei, a CCP official, warned that the threat of subversive information on social media could undermine support for the government. Li, according to notes of the discussion attended by senior executives from Weibo and Ant Group, stressed that “we need a media infrastructure that is held accountable.”