Comparable results though everything in FreeBSD is like a gig more for some reasons.
back
2 comments
That depends what you use to measure.
At first I used RES column from FreeBSD top(1) command.
Here are results for the same desktop environments from other tools:
| htop(1) | conky(1) | freecolor(1)
------------+---------+----------+-------------
FreeBSD | 112 MB | - - | 157 MB
Openbox | 237 MB | 460 MB | 382 MB
MATE | 508 MB | 778 MB | 788 MB
XFCE | 533 MB | 794 MB | 829 MB
helloSystem | 585 MB | - - | 830 MB
GNOME | 625 MB | 990 MB | 1000 MB
KDE/Plasma | 730 MB | 1659 MB | 1167 MB
This table above is also at the end of the blog post.So as You see depending on the used tool you may get REALLY different results while having the same components started.
Regards.
It's a bit a unfair comparison because you have include the ZFS-Arc AND Inact ("buffer" in the other test). Also tested under virtualbox = less drivers, buffer flushed, pipewire linux, pulse-audio freebsd? and so on...it's hard to compare those two test in this way.